Cool! Erik Brynjolfsson at MIT and his colleagues have done some interesting research on the increasing load of stuff that pours on our heads every day. Some observations are no-brainers...but one is a real call to action.
Here's the thing. Twenty five years ago, when I started working, there seemed to be enough money to actually train people on how to do things based on what we had learned in the past. In other words, no-one was in danger of reinventing the wheel. Then came the recession, and since then we've all had to make it up as we go along (hey I don't mind - I earn about 30% of my living filling the gap with companies and organizations who should know better.)
Information, Technology and Information Worker Productivity: Task Level Evidence
The Juice: Overall, these data show statistically
significant relationships among technology use, social networks,
completed projects, and revenues for project-based information workers.
- IT
use is positively correlated with non-linear drivers of productivity
- the structure and size of workers' communication networks are
highly correlated with performance
- an inverted-U shaped
relationship exists between multitasking and productivity such that,
beyond an optimum, more multitasking is associated with declining
project completion rates and revenue generation
- asynchronous
information seeking such as email and database use promotes
multitasking while synchronous information seeking over the phone shows
a negative correlation.
Optimize
May 2004,
Issue
31
4 strategies companies use to manage information
overload and overcome the bottlenecks
1. They simply ignore some of the information, either by
not gathering data at all, or when they do, by making sure to focus
only on what's most important. An obvious example is spam filters. But
the filtering and focusing usually don't even involve technology. Many
companies have explicit, conscious strategies to prune back the number
of service and product lines they manage. They constantly eliminate
low-performing areas and strive to avoid spreading their managerial
capacity too thin. By necessity, focus means learning what to ignore,
as well as what to pay attention to. This strategy for decision making
can be used at every level—individual workers, work groups, divisions,
as well as the corporation as a whole.
2. Develop intelligent, machine-based filters and automated
decision makers that off-load processes from humans via computers and
software. One of my favorite examples is the E-kiosks popping up
to speed the check-in process at airports. Other examples are automatic
expense-tracking systems, online reservations, and data-mining add-ons
that automate human processes, such as sales, maintenance, and demand
forecasts. These technologies are promising, but they have important
limits.
3. Introduce more distributed decision making. The hierarchy
of traditional businesses puts most decisions at the higher levels.
This causes overload at the top of the company. If you distribute
decision making to a flatter organizational structure, empowering
employees to make decisions, you get more brains working on a problem.
In fact, there's no reason this needs to be limited by company
boundaries. Customers and suppliers can also do more self-service and,
in many cases, timeliness, accuracy, and overall satisfaction will go
up. This is especially true when smart technologies are combined with
redefined decision rights. Examples are human-resources self service,
online customer support, ATMs, and Web sites that let customers
configure their own products.
The 20th-century company was characterized by a separation of
conceptualization and execution; a small group of people—the
"brains"—developed a plan, and a large group of people—the hired
"hands"—carried it out. That distinction is obsolete in the information
economy.
4. Improve employees' information-processing capacity. If you
distribute decision making, you'd better make sure your employees have
the skills to make the right decisions. Better training, education, and
hiring are needed. Of course, your competitors are trying to do the
same thing—it's an arms race in that regard—so there's a growing
premium on talent and retention. But in an economy where employees are
being given more decision-making authority, one A player is worth 10 B
players.
These approaches aren't mutually exclusive. Businesses have to be creative on all four bases.
Erik Brynjolfsson is professor of management at the MIT Sloan School of
Management and director of the Center for eBusiness at MIT